Messages

1

News and Developer Talk / Re: New free weekly decks and a permanent price reduction

« on: January 27, 2017, 05:18:13 AM »

Oh wow!

These deck are very interesting for new players. The faction pack cost is also a pretty good thing.

Keep up the good work.

2

News and Developer Talk / Re: Introducing ES as your new Community Manager & What’s the Team Been Up To Lately

« on: January 22, 2017, 04:34:29 PM »

Congrats ES and good luck!

3

News and Developer Talk / Re: Screenshot of ranked top 10 when reset should have happened

« on: January 01, 2017, 03:42:54 PM »

Do the developers even care about Infinity Wars?

Do we even have developers on Infinity Wars?

4

News and Developer Talk / Re: Weekly Post #14: Welcoming a new Community Manager!

« on: May 19, 2016, 01:10:05 AM »

Congratulations Drew and best of luck. Also, thank you Rikki for your good work and good luck in your course!

5

General Game Discussion / Re: Sound effect when mouse passes over buttons

« on: May 07, 2016, 03:14:27 PM »

Just remove it completely. I don't see the point of having a sound effect to inform me that my mouse is on top of a button.

6

Suggestions / Re: Yodmare. PLZ Do Something!

« on: May 05, 2016, 11:52:38 PM »

Yeah this game leaks like there is no tomorrow. I think the problem is even worse in the most recent patch, I only had issue in the deckbuilder in the past, but now, every few games, I need to restart the whole client.

7

General Game Discussion / Re: Sound effect when mouse passes over buttons

« on: May 05, 2016, 09:05:41 PM »

That sound effect is very annoying.

+1

8

Help Board / Re: Returning player

« on: April 22, 2016, 03:03:56 AM »

There was no account reset. You should contact Yodomare support and clear things up with them.

9

General Game Discussion / Re: [Re-Engaged Discussion] Veteran/Ranked Incentive

« on: April 13, 2016, 10:07:51 PM »

I miss the old leveling system too. There was no reward past a certain level, but it gave some sense of progression.

I think they should consider bringing it back with some reward attached to it.

10

General Game Discussion / Re: new patch broke!

« on: April 13, 2016, 10:00:21 PM »

The client is really laggy for me atm and requiring over a gig of memory without even starting a game in fact without even logging in.

That.

And as I play games, it requires more and more memory until it crashes.

11

General Game Discussion / Re: Which decks are you tired of seeing in ranked/constructed?

« on: April 02, 2016, 04:56:15 AM »

... ranked score algorithms, ranked seasons taxonomy and rewards, etc.

Yes finally some love for ranked!

12

General Game Discussion / Re: Draft leaderboard: ties in alphabetical order?

« on: April 02, 2016, 04:52:16 AM »

-The first person to hit X wins for the week keeps the top spot for that particular number of wins; second person keeps the 2nd spot, and so on.

+1 ,I liked your first suggestion, "First come, first serve" seems right to me.

Yep, already looking into this.

Thank you

13

News and Developer Talk / Re: [Weekly Post #8] Cultivated Draft List & Rarity Changes

« on: March 30, 2016, 03:08:47 AM »

Is the new Alt-Art for Plaguebearer done by new people from Yodo or you are re-using some older version made by Lightmare?

If I'm not mistaken, this will be your first new card art; so you guys better deliver!

14

News and Developer Talk / Re: [Weekly Post #8] Cultivated Draft List & Rarity Changes

« on: March 30, 2016, 03:03:02 AM »

Here is my two cents

Cards NOT available as commanders

Emberstarter: Rikki explained why it was removed, so I'll pass on this one.
Overcharged Bot: He is fine, I don't see the point.
Hungry Abomination: No problem with him.
Hunted Dragon: No problem with him.
Flame Dawn Fanatic: I would not care that much if you remove him, but it seems like a pretty random choice.

Honestly, why not ban all factionless cards from command? I can't think of a single factionless card I would like as a commmander.

Cards NOT available in deck, but available as commanders

There is no problem with any of these 3 cards. This section is completely useless. I would just remove Radariah completely from draft. Aleta Traveler is a card I actually prefer in my deck than in my command.

Cards NOT available in draft at all

Azael: Why are we banning this again?
Etheral Fusion: This does not work 9 times out of 10, but when it works, it's the best feeling; does not deserve a ban.

There was a lot of other card I was not sure, but after reading Rikki post, I can understand what you guys are trying to do. I like situational pick, but you are right that too much of situational pick can clutter the pick phase, so I'm willing to try this new pool and see what come up with it.

There is a card I would add to this list: Endless Horde.

There is just no point ever. Since you guys started with an empty pool and decided to INCLUDE this card in it, either there is a good reason or it was late that night and you guys were tired because it's really just an useless card.

For the rarity change, I'm fine with all except the mechanism one. Move to uncommon, it will be fine like that.

15

General Game Discussion / Re: Draft leaderboard: ties in alphabetical order?

« on: March 30, 2016, 01:36:49 AM »

So, something I just noticed.  In the draft leaderboard, all players with the same # wins are ordered alphabetically.  Now that there's prizes for certain cutoffs, this seems kind of unfair doesn't it?  Having a username that begins near the beginning of the alphabet (or better, with a number) gives you an advantage.  Shouldn't some fairer system be used?  A few ideas:

-The first person to hit X wins for the week keeps the top spot for that particular number of wins; second person keeps the 2nd spot, and so on.

-Randomly insert players into the list of existing players at X number of wins.

-Alternate between alphabetical and reverse alphabetical order.

I'm sure none of these is ideal either, but if I look at the leaderboard right now, place 45-58 all have 10 wins, and the only reason, say, Daeron makes the cutoff but Quasor doesn't is because D comes before Q, and the same person will always have the advantage just because of this.

As someone with a name that start with a fricking Y, I could not agree more. Your first solution is very fair and logical, so I would go for that.

Most of the time it is not a big deal, but the day top 2 have the same number of wins, it will be apparent there is a problem with this system, so let's fix it before it come to that.